Modeling independent performance are separate conditions. A response after a live or video demonstration is modeled performance unless the written definition treats that example as an ordinary part of the real task. An independent probe usually presents the natural cue without the added teaching model. Families should ask how observation, model type, added prompts, response components, generalization, and maintenance are scored.

Define modeling independent performance conditions

Name the natural cue and whether a model is routinely available outside teaching. A cooking tutorial may be an ordinary support; a therapist demonstration inserted before every trial is an added prompt. Use definitions that reflect the actual goal.

Keep categories exclusive

Report independent before model, correct after model, correct after another prompt, partial response, error, no response, withdrawal, and invalid opportunity. A whole-task percentage can hide which components required demonstration.

Use concepts within scope

The ABAI page and BACB outline distinguish modeling, imitation, prompts, generalization, maintenance, and evaluation. They do not define independence for every routine. The Ethics Code supports accurate documentation.

Avoid causal conclusions

Improvement after a model may reflect the demonstration, practice, feedback, materials, time, or another change. Use matched probes or a stronger design when causation matters. Report descriptive evidence as descriptive.

Example and family questions

Across eight repair steps, Cole completes two before any model, four after a video segment, one after a gesture, and declines one. Ask: Which model is ordinary? What is the probe denominator? Are components and whole-task outcomes both visible?

Related resources

Sources

Finni resources

Ready for the next step?

Find ABA care near you