To evaluate time delay prompting outcomes, define Vera's natural cue, zero-delay or current delay phase, duration, clock start, accessible independent response, prompt, consequence, error correction, premature prompt, missed prompt, reset, and exposure. Measure independent responses, prompted responses, errors, latency, integrity, burden, and transfer. One delay value cannot serve as a universal standard across people, responses, or settings.

Define the phase

State zero delay, constant delay, progressive delay, or another arrangement with exact duration, advancement, hold, rollback, reset, and stop rules.

Anchor the clock

Start at the natural cue and timestamp response and prompt onset. Record cue variability, interruptions, partner movement, and precision limits.

Protect accessible responding

Select a window that accommodates Vera's speech, AAC, motor, sensory, and processing access. Preserve an immediate way to ask for help or stop.

Audit prompt integrity

Classify on-time, early, late, omitted, repeated, stronger, weaker, inaccessible, and missing prompt events. Keep implementation separate from outcome.

Measure transfer cautiously

Use natural-cue probes and relevant settings with ordinary supports. Independence during one delay phase does not establish durable control or generalization.

Use this sequence to evaluate time delay prompting outcomes

Define Vera's phase and clock, preserve accessible response and help, measure independence and prompt integrity by delay, record burden, use bounded probes, and revise through qualified client-informed review.

Build Vera's time-delay outcome review

Create one versioned time-delay outcome review for the community-café ordering review. Include Vera's priority, natural cue, accessible response, independent window, prompt topography, level, latency, sequence, escalation or fading, consequence, correction, access, health, exposure, planned and delivered prompts, first-response codes, reserved probes, integrity, agreement, invalidity, missingness, withdrawal, direct experience, burden, result, uncertainty, decision, owner, correction, and review trigger. Store only decision-relevant information with role-limited access.

Validate Vera's prompt evidence

Reproduce Vera's 0/10, 4/10, 6/10 and 10/10, 9/10, 8/10 phase results. Audit cue onset, clock precision, delay duration, accessible response, prompt onset, early and missed prompts, error correction, consequence, order, and exposure. Ask Vera about comfort and wait usefulness. Preserve independent probes and client-requested help. A new task or slower AAC access requires a new delay review. Before increasing a delay, inspect the latest eligible opportunities for independent responding, errors, early prompts, missed prompts, response latency, distress, help requests, and implementation drift. Record the exact evidence supporting advance, hold, rollback, or stop. Repeat the check after any delay change.

Keep Vera's prompting, independence, and experience separate

Measure prompt delivery and integrity with due opportunities. Measure independent, prompted, error, correction, and probe performance with their own units. Ask Vera separately about clarity, effort, comfort, usefulness, burden, and whether assessment should continue. Accurate prompting can coexist with poor fit or unwanted control. Better experience can also occur without evidence that fading caused transfer.

Work through Vera's example

Vera has 10 opportunities at zero delay, 10 at three seconds, and 10 at five seconds. Independent responses occur in 0/10, 4/10, and 6/10. Prompt delivery meets the phase rule in 10/10, 9/10, and 8/10. Two five-second opportunities include an early prompt. Report phase-specific independence and integrity; longer delay, practice, order, and familiarity changed together. Preserve every planned and valid unit, raw count, denominator, cue state, response code, prompt topography, level, latency, delivery, correction, access state, integrity result, probe, withdrawal, direct report, system failure, correction, and unresolved item. This fictional example demonstrates one assessment control. It offers no universal prompt hierarchy, independence, mastery, generalization, diagnosis, trait, treatment effect, legal conclusion, coverage decision, payment promise, or outcome guarantee.

Address Vera's main assessment risk

Interpreting 0, 4, and 6 as proof that more waiting caused independence ignores phase order and repeated exposure. Treating early prompts as Vera's prompted responses hides the implementation error. Review cue and response definitions, prompt topography, latency, sequence, access, motor and sensory needs, consequence, correction, partner behavior, context, client experience, authority, and causal scope separately. High prompted accuracy cannot repair an inaccessible, burdensome, or ethically unsound arrangement.

Keep prompting concepts and authority clear for Vera

The ABAI Basic Principles page supplies broad higher-education context. The BACB Test Content Outline covers response and stimulus prompts, prompt fading, time delay, stimulus-control transfer, integrity, and evaluation as examination content. The current BACB Ethics Code addresses competence, involvement, consent and assent when applicable, medical needs, risk, data, documentation, and evaluation for covered people. These sources do not create an individualized prompt plan for Vera.

Use individualized prompt selection for Vera

The prompting decision tool organizes variables for evaluating and selecting prompting strategies. It supports explicit attention to skill, task, error history, prompt type, fading, efficiency, and context. It remains an evidence-informed decision aid rather than a universal hierarchy, legal authority, or guaranteed procedure for Vera.

Read small prompting comparisons cautiously for Vera

Libby and colleagues compared most-to-least, least-to-most, and a delayed most-to-least arrangement in small Lego-construction studies. Error and acquisition-speed patterns varied by procedure and participant. The study supplies comparison variables rather than a universal winner or expected outcome for Vera.

Expect task and participant variation for Vera

Fentress and Lerman compared prompting procedures across tasks and reported variation relevant to acquisition and prompt dependence. Narrow samples and tasks limit generalization. For Vera, report the task, natural cue, prompt history, errors, latency, independent probes, access, and client experience directly.

Preserve treatment scope, AAC, assent, and access for Vera

The CASP public summary supplies high-level ABA behavioral-health-treatment scope for autistic people, with licensed detail outside this page. ASHA's AAC portal says AAC users should always have access to their communication tools or devices. Breaux and Smith provide assent-focused guidance in an evolving evidence base. Follow governing sources and preserve communication, health care, food, water, bathroom use, mobility, rest, relationships, safety, and emergency help for Vera.

Choose Vera's next bounded action

Vera chooses a five-second visual wait cue in the café and asks partners to prompt sooner when she signals uncertainty or requests help. Record the qualified owner, supporting evidence, effective date, current supports, health and access state, implementation check, accessible explanation, disagreement route, and reassessment trigger. Preserve the original assessment when cues, responses, people, systems, tasks, or preferences change. A new arrangement creates a dated version rather than an error in Vera's earlier performance.

Close Vera's prompt review

Review the time-delay outcome review with Vera, the qualified behavior analyst, relevant partners, access owners, and specialists named in the manifest. Confirm that prompted performance stays separate from natural-cue control, teaching and probe denominators are reproducible, AAC and basic access remain protected, health and motor questions stay with qualified professionals, and conclusions remain bounded to the sampled response, prompt, task, people, and context. Keep this page draft and noindex until every required review is complete.

Related resources

Sources