An ABA practice access review compares every user, vendor, and service account with current role, work need, sensitive data, system, permission, approval, and employment or contract state. It checks joiner, mover, and leaver changes, elevated access, exceptions, removals, and validation. Least privilege means the access needed for assigned work under the applicable policy, not the fewest permissions regardless of function.

Define the access review

Adela uses system-generated populations where available and reconciles them to workforce, contractor, vendor, role, and service-account inventories. Manager memory is supporting evidence, not the full population. Every row has a stable identifier, owner, custodian, source, effective period, state, evidence, exception, change trigger, next review, and relationship to the decisions it supports.

Choose fields that support the decision

Record review period and systems, population source, person or account, account type, workforce or vendor relationship, current role and site, employment or contract status, data class, permission and privilege tier, business need, approver, last use, shared or service-account owner, multifactor and authentication state, joiner-mover-leaver event, exception and expiry, reviewer and conflict, retain, modify, suspend, or remove decision, ticket, completion evidence, failed removal, validation, incident route, and next review.

Separate source facts from practice decisions

For every access grant, change, or removal, preserve the role request, manager approval, system evidence, policy basis, exception, or security decision that establishes the authorized state. The practice's supported, held, conditional, retired, or exception state appears in a separate field with an owner and date. A portal result, marketing statement, verbal comment, identifier, or old approval never silently becomes controlling evidence.

Set entry, review, and retirement rules

Define when access is granted or changed, when the new state becomes effective, who reviews it, which role events reopen review, and when access must be removed. Source expiry, staff changes, new sites, payer updates, system releases, incidents, audit findings, contract changes, and capacity shifts can trigger review. Historical versions remain available for older transactions and explanations.

Connect fields to real workflow gates

Trace which clinical, scheduling, billing, payroll, purchasing, reporting, and security workflows rely on each access state. Software may surface a current state and block a defined release. Authorized roles decide exceptions and qualified clinicians retain clinical judgment. The operational record keeps each decision and author visible.

Make a bounded operating decision

The practice turns each review decision into an executed and verified change. Retain means the reviewer confirmed the current role and need. Modify names the permissions to add or remove. Suspend or remove creates a ticket with an expected completion time and a check from the target system. Exceptions identify the approver, reason, limited access, monitoring, and automatic expiry. Failed removals and orphaned accounts escalate as security issues. The practice samples high-risk permissions after completion and reconciles the final account population so a closed ticket does not hide access that remained active elsewhere.

Reconcile independent source populations

Reconcile access records against staff rosters, role changes, terminations, manager approvals, identity systems, application logs, vendor access, and security incidents. Differences receive an owner, consequence, next action, due date, and validation instead of disappearing through manual overwrites.

A fictional example

Adela locks 64 accounts across four systems. Fifty match active roles, approvals, and current need. Four former-worker accounts remain open, three users retain prior-role access, two vendor accounts lack owners, two exceptions expired, and three service accounts lack review evidence. Ten accounts repair or close. Four require documented exceptions and extra monitoring. The scenario is synthetic. It tests scope, evidence, state, exception, and denominator logic without establishing legal compliance, clinical quality, coverage, payment, licensure, competence, security, financial accuracy, client satisfaction, or outcome.

Calculate compatible measures

Initial access alignment is 50 of 64, or 78.1%. Sixty accounts validate, or 93.8%. People, accounts, systems, roles, permissions, elevated privileges, exceptions, and removal tickets retain separate counts.

Control the main risk

Reviewing only active employees misses vendors, shared credentials, test users, integration accounts, and privileged roles. Adela locks the complete account population before decisions begin.

Test hard cases

Test new hire, transfer, leave, termination, contractor end, vendor support, dormant account, service account, shared credential, emergency access, expired exception, and failed removal. Each case shows the source, owner, current state, affected workflow, immediate safeguard, exception route, correction, validation, and retirement or next-review rule.

Close the review with open work visible

Before closing the review, confirm population completeness, source currency, decision authority, qualified ownership, evidence, cross-register links, exceptions, change triggers, workflow use, validation, unresolved work, and next review. The access review remains draft until every named reviewer completes the required review.

Use CASP as organizational context

Use the CASP Organizational Guidelines public overview for high-level business, clinical-operations, and risk-management context. CASP sells the detailed guidance. The public page does not prescribe this access review, prove a row is complete, or grant authority for whether a person, vendor, or account should retain each permission.

Apply voluntary compliance guidance carefully

When reviewing the access review workflow, treat the OIG General Compliance Program Guidance as voluntary and nonbinding. Its discussions of risk assessment, policies, training, reporting, audits, corrective action, incentives, and oversight help test register design. Current law, contract, payer, professional, workforce, privacy, finance, and operational sources control each real decision.

Keep business orientation separate from authority

For broad business context around the access review workflow, use the SBA Manage Your Business guide as orientation across finances, employees, compliance, marketing, emergencies, and closure. It gives no ABA clinical, payer, privacy, licensure, facility, credentialing, tax, or legal authority. The register cites current primary sources for every material state.

Preserve clinical decision rights

For professional duties reflected in the access review workflow, apply the current BACB Ethics Code only to covered people and professional activities. The Code addresses competence, responsibility, client involvement, documentation, supervision, risk, evaluation, billing, and reporting. BACB has no separate corporate jurisdiction. Organizational ownership and register custody never replace qualified case-specific clinical judgment.

Scope privacy and security fields

For electronic PHI represented in the access review workflow, use HHS risk-analysis guidance when a covered entity or business associate must assess risks and vulnerabilities to all electronic protected health information it creates, receives, maintains, or transmits. HHS minimum-necessary guidance informs role-based PHI access when that standard applies. Neither source mandates a particular database, register, score, spreadsheet, or vendor product.

Use cybersecurity and provider identifiers within limits

For cybersecurity and identifier dependencies in the access review workflow, the practice can adapt the NIST Cybersecurity Framework as voluntary risk-management guidance while current legal and contractual requirements remain controlling. The CMS NPI fact sheet distinguishes individual and organizational identifiers and states that an NPI does not establish licensure, credentialing, enrollment, or payment. Identifiers connect records; they do not validate the underlying configuration.

Rebuild access after a role transfer

When a scheduler moves to billing, do not simply add the new role. Identify every system, group, report, shared drive, service account, delegated permission, device, and local artifact tied to the old work. Remove or justify each access under current policy, then grant the new minimum configuration through the proper approval route. Verify the effective result in connected systems and preserve exceptions with owners and expiration dates.

Related resources

Sources