Choose a controlling prompt that reliably evokes the target response, fits the person's sensory, motor, communication, and health needs, and uses no more intrusion than the situation supports. Test its effectiveness and acceptability, define staff delivery, preserve assent and a withdrawal response, and monitor errors or distress. A prompt that is ineffective, inaccessible, painful, coercive, or outside staff competence needs immediate review.
Choose controlling prompt features
Specify the prompt form, intensity, timing, duration, position, response expected, safety constraints, and who may deliver it. Confirm the person can perceive it and physically respond without preventable strain.
Separate control from force
Controlling means the prompt is expected to produce the correct target response. It does not authorize restraint, forced movement, removal of communication, or overriding withdrawal. Physical contact requires specific competence, consent, assent when applicable, and risk controls.
Use professional scope
The BACB outline covers prompt assessment and fading. The Ethics Code addresses competence, medical needs, client involvement, assent when applicable, restrictive procedures, risk, and evaluation. These sources do not select a prompt for an individual.
Consider communication access
ASHA supports ongoing AAC access. In the telehealth study, visual and verbal controlling prompts were defined within the study procedure. A practice must verify that its chosen form fits the person's communication and access method.
A practical example
Jules can follow a visual model and finds hand-over-hand contact uncomfortable. The team tests the visual model across five teaching opportunities; it produces four correct prompted responses without distress. The fifth error prompts a procedural review, not added force.
Questions families can use
Why should this prompt control the response? Can the person perceive and tolerate it? Is touch involved? How can they pause or decline? Who is trained to deliver it? What evidence triggers a change?
Sources
- Behavior Analyst Certification Board, BCBA Test Content Outline, 6th edition
- Mengi and colleagues, Simultaneous Prompting Delivered by Telehealth to Teach Young Children with Autism
- Leaf and colleagues, Comparison of Simultaneous Prompting and No-No Prompting in Two-Choice Discrimination Learning with Children with Autism
- Reichow and Wolery, Comparison of Everyday and Every-Fourth-Day Probe Sessions with the Simultaneous Prompting Procedure
- Akmanoglu and colleagues, Comparison of Simultaneous Prompting and Constant Time Delay Procedures in Teaching Children with Autism
- Tekin-Iftar and Olcay-Gul, Increasing Instructional Efficiency When Using Simultaneous Prompting Procedure in Teaching Academic Skills to Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders
- Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts
- American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Finni resources