To measure retained supports in ABA plans, inventory the AAC, mobility, sensory, visual, human, technological, and environmental supports the client chooses to keep. Check availability and correct setup before performance, distinguish support use from prompting, and record failures, repairs, burden, and client experience. Supported success remains success, and an independence metric should never reward losing useful access.

Inventory retained supports precisely

Record the support, purpose, client preference, owner, setting, setup, backup, maintenance, privacy, safety, and review date. Include natural supports, environmental arrangements, and formal clinical prompts.

Separate support from prompt

A support can provide access without directing a target response. Define whether an item is AAC, accommodation, mobility aid, visual reference, environmental control, personal assistance, teaching prompt, safety control, or another function under the specific plan.

Measure availability and setup

Use all scheduled or eligible periods as the readiness denominator. Score presence, functioning, positioning, current content, partner knowledge, permission, battery or supplies, and backup. Keep missing or failed support in system data.

Measure client choice and use

Ask whether Jori wants the support present, whether she uses it, whether the form fits, and whether she changes or declines it. A present support does not prove access, use, satisfaction, or continued preference.

Evaluate outcomes without subtracting support

Report participation, communication, safety, effort, burden, error, experience, and generalization with the support in place. Avoid labels such as dependent when the support is an effective, chosen part of ordinary participation.

Govern any fading decision

Require a client-informed reason, qualified owner, current evidence, accessible discussion, consent or assent when applicable, reversible trial, stop rule, restoration route, and review of unwanted effects before changing a retained support.

Build Jori's retained-support measurement plan

Create one versioned retained-support measurement plan for the postsecondary coursework. Include the construct, decision question, direct client communication, source-labeled proxy evidence, consent and assent when applicable, privacy, AAC and retained supports, authority, readiness, client and partner units, missingness, experience, burden, owners, dates, and review triggers. Define every numerator, denominator, duration, exclusion, and maturity rule before data collection.

Keep a decision-ready record for Jori

For Jori's record, identify the source and date, client-selected response method, setting, period, opportunities, support conditions, access failures, prompts, partner actions, raw values, missing categories, corrections, uncertainty, qualified interpretation, decision, interim support, implementation, client communication, confirmation, and next review. Restrict sensitive data to approved roles and systems.

Work through Jori's example

Jori's plan names six retained supports across ten classes. Every support is available and correctly set up in seven classes. Jori uses at least one support in all seven and completes the chosen participation action in six. Report 7/10 full readiness, 7/7 supported use, and 6/7 participation without subtracting for support. Keep every readiness state, client response, partner action, numerator, denominator, missing event, exclusion, support, and experience measure visible. This fictional example demonstrates one control. It supplies no universal threshold, diagnosis, legal conclusion, payer result, causal finding, or outcome guarantee.

Use Jori's data for a bounded decision

Before collecting another Jori measure, name the decision it may inform and who owns that decision. Options may include continue, clarify, restore access, add support, revise, pause, refer, investigate, retire, or close. Record the evidence needed, due date, stop or safety rule, client-facing explanation, review route, and criteria for reopening.

Address Jori's main fit risk

Scoring only unaided responses turns a missing caption, schedule, or AAC device into apparent independence work. Jori's plan measures whether supports enable the outcome she chose. Review access, privacy, partner behavior, burden, health, safety, missingness, and lived experience separately. A precise percentage can still answer the wrong question when the construct, source, opportunity, or decision rule is poorly defined.

Choose Jori's next action

The college repairs three readiness failures, Jori reviews whether all six supports still fit, and the team compares burden and participation after repair. Preserve the original evidence and any disagreement. Record the qualified owner, affected plan version and setting, interim protection, additional source needed, due date, implementation evidence, client communication, confirmation, correction route, disposition, and next review.

Put Jori's support measure into routine use

Teams that measure retained supports in ABA plans should maintain a versioned support register for every setting. Give every support an owner, setup check, backup, maintenance trigger, client-preference field, and failure route. Review readiness before interpreting participation, and display supported outcomes without downgrading them. When a support is absent, document whether the cause was inventory, charging, transport, positioning, permission, partner knowledge, or another system condition. Ask Jori whether the replacement or repair fits. Any proposed fading should open a separate qualified decision with evidence, a reversible trial, client communication, and restoration criteria.

Review Jori's support data as an access system

Show scheduled periods, full readiness, partial readiness, unavailable support, client choice, actual use, participation, effort, burden, and experience. Segment by support and setting so a recurring device or partner failure remains visible outside the overall average. Review whether the inventory reflects Jori's current preferences and whether backups work under real conditions. Inspect any period labeled independent to confirm that useful natural and environmental supports were still counted accurately. When outcomes change, distinguish support availability, support use, task change, health, partner behavior, and other concurrent events. End with a disposition for every support: retain, repair, replace, add, review, or begin a reversible client-informed trial. Record the owner, evidence, stop rule, restoration route, and Jori's confirmation.

Keep maintenance and backup failures visible until the repaired support passes testing.

Apply current professional sources to Jori's measurement

For Jori's measurement, the BACB ethics hub identifies the current Ethics Code, which addresses understandable communication, client involvement, consent and assent when applicable, assessment, medical needs, risk, documentation, and evaluation for covered people. BACB has no separate organizational jurisdiction. The BCBA outline is examination content and supplies no practice authority. The CASP public summary gives high-level context for ABA treatment of autistic people. An evidence-based ABA framework supports integrating research, clinical expertise, client values, and context.

Use implementation and access evidence for Jori

For Jori's plan, the treatment-integrity practitioner guide, Essig review, impact study, and reporting review support explicit procedures, representative implementation evidence, and cautious interpretation. They create no universal experience, access, or response threshold. Breaux and Smith offer assent-focused guidance while describing an evolving evidence base. ASHA supports continuous access to AAC tools or devices.

Close Jori's measurement review

Review the retained-support measurement plan with Jori, the responsible clinician, affected partners, and the specialists named in the manifest. Check whether the measure remains understandable, accessible, low burden, representative, and useful for the stated decision. Preserve direct communication, ordinary supports, source disagreements, versions, limitations, and open gaps. Keep this page draft and noindex until all required reviews are complete.

Related resources

Sources